Privacy Impact Assessments as a Means to Achieve the Objectives of Procedural Justice
Since the participation of stakeholders in privacy impact assessments (PIAs) is considered insufficient, the theory of procedural justice can inspire the strengthening the public voice in the governance of privacy. However, the relationship between PIAs and procedural justice is more complex. This papers attempts to demonstrate the way in which PIAs serve the idea of procedural justice as well as what PIAs can learn from procedural justice. In conclusion it is argued that PIAs living up to the procedural justice standards are a good means to achieve the fairness of the proceedings.
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- 1. Why this research?
- 2. The concept of (ideal) privacy impact assessments
- 2.1. In the privacy protection field, attention has shifted from reactive measures towards more anticipatory ones. The governance of privacy has focused nowadays on accountability
- 2.2. The PIA process is based on a logic of accountability and transparency
- 2.3. However, stakeholders
- 3. The theory of procedural justice
- 3.1. People care not only about the outcome of the proceedings but also about the way they were handled (distributive vs. procedural justice)
- 3.2. Procedural justice influences satisfaction and compliance with the decisions made as well as strengthens legitimacy of both the decisions made and of decision-makers
- 3.3. Procedural justice is based on participation (voice), neutrality, respect and trust
- 4. Privacy impact assessments serve the idea of procedural justice
- 5. Procedural justice can improve privacy impact assessment
- 5.1. For the benefit of stakeholders
- 5.2. For the benefit of organisations and assessors
- 6. Concluding remarks
- 7. References
Loggen Sie sich bitte ein, um den ganzen Text zu lesen.
Es gibt noch keine Kommentare
Ihr Kommentar zu diesem Beitrag
AbonnentInnen dieser Zeitschrift können sich an der Diskussion beteiligen. Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Kommentare verfassen zu können.
0 Kommentare