Legal informatics and our basic method
A method is a many-splendored thing. On the most general level, it no doubt brings the practitioners of a science together. Similarly, a method provides professions with a frame of reference – coordinates to steer by. True to form then, being lawyers, we are convinced that our method is a bond we share, and something that distinguishes us from other professions. In theory, this is in fact the case; in practice, we find a very different story. A great deal of legal literature – especially doctrinal literature – lacks expressly articulated methods or commitments to a particular school of thought. Yet, if we take a look at what we write, we find quite a few things that mark us out as lawyers. Indeed, as Alois Troller did, we can speak of the profession as having a basic method. It is the routine we follow that tells us what is important in legal life, in particular in legal literature and communicating research findings. This basic method inevitably changes over time.
The contribution takes a close look at how Legal Informatics has changed – or is changing – the profession’s basic method and confirmation bias.
The contribution takes a close look at how Legal Informatics has changed – or is changing – the profession’s basic method and confirmation bias.
Table of contents
- 1. Professions and methods
- 2. The basic method in the era of Legal Informatics
- 3. Concluding remarks
- References
Loggen Sie sich bitte ein, um den ganzen Text zu lesen.
There are no comments yet
Ihr Kommentar zu diesem Beitrag
AbonnentInnen dieser Zeitschrift können sich an der Diskussion beteiligen. Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Kommentare verfassen zu können.
No comments