Citation: David Rosenthal, Eine Replik auf das «Cloud»-Gutachten, in: Jusletter IT 15 February 2024
Markus Schefer and Philip Glass recently published an expert opinion according to which the use of M365 by public bodies results in a serious infringement of fundamental rights because US authorities allegedly can freely access all data in the cloud. In a reply, David Rosenthal shows why these assumptions are wrong and why their conclusions are, therefore, untenable. However, all three agree on the validity of the risk-based approach, which, according to Rosenthal, allows the use of the cloud even without the much cited, but often impracticable «end-to-end» encryption, for example because the gain in data security justifies any interventions.
Table of contents
A. Anlass der Replik
B. Zusammenfassung der Replik
C. Fehlerhafte Annahmen
1. Missverständnis betreffend das U.S. Recht
2. Keine Verletzung der Cybercrime Convention und des Ordre Public
3. Ein Angemessenheitsbeschluss für die U.S.A. steht kurz bevor
4. Der theoretische Zugriff ist noch kein tatsächlicher
Jurius is your personal assistant for all questions related to Weblaw. Whether you need information about subscriptions, products, or services, Jurius is here to help. Just ask your question and receive immediate answers.
.webp){kind=logo}
