Lawyers as Designers, Engineers and Innovators: Better Legal Documents through Information Design and Visualization
Legal materials are widely available, online and offline. But are they actually read and understood? Empirical research shows that this is not always the case. Turning to lawyers does not necessarily help: legal advice may be too complex to be useful. If legal documents are ignored or misunderstood by those who are expected to read and act upon them, there is something seriously wrong. A profound change is required. After introducing research-based criteria of good documents, this paper illustrates, with case studies, how information design and visualization have been applied to improve legal documents: Wikimedia Foundation’s new, user-friendly trademark policy; a law firm’s award-winning advice letter template; and complex legal texts transformed into easy-to-use layered information. The results demonstrate how a fresh, innovative approach to design practices enables the production of better legal documents: legally sound, while easier for users to understand and act upon.
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- 1. The Makings of Good (or Better) Legal Documents
- 1.1. What Is Wrong with Current Legal Documents?
- 1.2. Characteristics of Good Documents
- 2. Examples of Using Information Design and Visualization in Legal Documents
- 2.1. Wikimedia Foundation’s New, User-Friendly Trademark Policy; Legal Design Jams
- 2.2. A Law Firms’ Award-winning Template for Pragmatic Legal Advice Letters
- 2.3. Complex Legal Texts Transformed into Easy-to-use Layered Information
- 3. Conclusion
- 4. References
Loggen Sie sich bitte ein, um den ganzen Text zu lesen.
There are no comments yet
Ihr Kommentar zu diesem Beitrag
AbonnentInnen dieser Zeitschrift können sich an der Diskussion beteiligen. Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Kommentare verfassen zu können.
No comments