Transforming the IP System
From Competition Towards Collaboration
The author was asked by the European Commission to analyze as external consultant the effectiveness of the SME IP Helpdesks, a policy measure which tries to boost the EU knowledge economy. He concludes that China’s economic might has undermined the concept of intangible asset protection and has accelerated the natural evolution of the IP system. Accepting the status quo will contribute to the supranational organization’s dissolution as it is being challenged by rising nationalism and economic competition. The author suggests a pre-emptive system transformation from competition and profit towards collaboration and purpose.
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. Methodology and Evaluation POV
- 2.1. Logotherapy
- 2.2. Systems Theory
- 2.3. Sinology and Fareast Asian Studies
- 3. Status Quo System
- 3.1. Policy and Administrative Framework
- 3.2. Allocated EU Budget
- 3.3. Policy Teleology
- 3.4. Competing Knowledge Economies
- 3.5. Small and Medium Sized Enterprises
- 3.6. Definition of the Status Quo System
- 4. Challenges of the Status Quo System
- 4.1. Hampering Innovation
- 4.2. IPR System Undermined by China
- 4.3. Shortening Innovation Cycles
- 4.4. Labor Market Transformation
- 4.5. Profit Extraction vs Value Added
- 4.6. Changing Innovation Patterns
- 5. Target System
- 6. Conclusions and Recommendations to Initiate a Transformation
- 6.1. Discontinue IHD
- 6.2. Combine IPR Policy with Cutting Edge Innovation Studies
- 6.3. Assess Investments Contributing to vs. Protecting of Innovation
- 6.4. Install IPR System Incentives for Innovations Which Serve the General Well-Being
- 7. Sources
- 7.1. Specific Sources
- 7.2. General Sources
Loggen Sie sich bitte ein, um den ganzen Text zu lesen.
There are no comments yet
Ihr Kommentar zu diesem Beitrag
AbonnentInnen dieser Zeitschrift können sich an der Diskussion beteiligen. Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Kommentare verfassen zu können.
No comments