Gerichtsurteile neu darstellen – Legal Design Thinking anhand eines Bundesgerichtsurteils
This work deals with the question of how federal court decisions can be made more understandable and accessible to non-lawyers through legal design thinking. For this purpose, a randomly selected federal court decision was redesigned. The goal was not to didactically change the decision, but to emphasise the important/decisive points by using bullet points, colouring or bold printing of parts of the sentence. Care was taken to ensure that no relevant arguments of an opposing party were overlooked. A prepared outline of the facts did not add any value, but explanations of legal terms in the footnotes and supplementing the «Regeste» with «key take-aways» helped. It is believed that these methods make an implementation by the court more likely than when the judge or clerk is encouraged to use more commonly understood terms and phrases.
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- I. Einleitung
- II. Legal Design Thinking
- III. Der Legal Design Prozess
- 1. Team and Cultural Building
- 2. Research and Unterstanding
- 3. Synthesize and Define
- 4. Idea Development
- 5. Prototyping and Testing
- 6. Implementation
- IV. Legally Designed Bundesgerichtsentscheid
- 1. Team and Cultural Building
- 2. Research and Unterstanding
- 3. Synthezise and Define
- 4. Idea Development
- 5. Prototyping and Testing
- V. Fazit
- Anhang
- Interview 1:
- Interview 2
- Interview 3
- Interview 4
- BGE 148 IV 113 neu dargestellt
Loggen Sie sich bitte ein, um den ganzen Text zu lesen.
There are no comments yet
Ihr Kommentar zu diesem Beitrag
AbonnentInnen dieser Zeitschrift können sich an der Diskussion beteiligen. Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Kommentare verfassen zu können.
No comments