Dear readers
Three articles in this issue are dedicated to Legal Design (Thinking). Julian Hundegger* deals in general with the chances of this method for the legal sector and asks which preconditions have to be met in the thinking of lawyers. Vittore Osele* deals with the question of how federal court rulings can be made more understandable or accessible for non-lawyers - and has redesigned a judgment. Antonio Maric*, on the other hand, has suggestions on how to better visualize the contents of data protection declarations. Speaking of visualization: In their TechLawNews, Daniel Ronzani and Simon Schlauri have summarized the most important points of the total revision of the Data Protection Act in key words and with visual aids.
Chiara Zengerer* examines how the decisions of an AI are to be judged in terms of their comprehensibility in comparison to the decisions of human judges. Fabian Teichmann puts himself in the role of a (hypothetical) perpetrator and experimentally investigates how criminals can use generative artificial intelligence to plan and execute DDoS crimes.
Fabio Caramaschi* explores the potential and future development opportunities and challenges of legal tech providers in air passenger law.
Baltasar Cevc, Maik Ebersoll, Klaus Gresbrand, Kai Jacob, Susanne Marks, Jutta Löwe and Dmitri Geidel from Liquid Legal Institute have made an important contribution to contract lifecycle management with their whitepaper on contract metadata.
We wish you an exciting read and a nice summer!
Philip Hanke
Publishing Director
* The articles were written as part of the course «LegalTech and its impact on the world of work» at the HSG. See also the «Next Generation» issue of November 12, 2020.